The collection used here is clearly mutable in nature. So how do you prevent this data from being changed?
dictionaries). Bey it turns out, many lists are never changed, or at least never extended. Of course ReadOnlyCollection introduces yet more syntactic noise, and it doesn't even convey quite what I mean; after all ReadOnlyCollection may wrap a mutating
foreach C# dilinin deyimi (for eachVisual Basic'te) numaralandırıcıların kompozitşıklığını gizler. Bu nedenle, numaralandırıcıyı elden nüfuz etmek yerine kullanılması foreach önerilir.
Bey the last point states, you shouldn't avoid ReadOnlyCollection like you were suggesting. It is a very useful type to use for public members to inform the consumer of the limitations of the collection they are accessing.
This base class is provided to make it easier for implementers to create a generic read-only custom collection. Implementers are encouraged to extend this base class instead of creating their own.
Distinct(IEnumerable) Returns distinct elements from a sequence by using the default equality comparer to compare values.
Çkızılışma zamanında yalnızca constructor içerisinde eder ataması yapılabilmektedir. Damarı bozuk halde salt okunur bir alana kadir atanamaz tembihsı vermektedir. Readonly oynak tanılamamı dundaki gibidir.
Özellikle verilerin belli bir sıraya için aksiyonlenmesi müstelzim durumlarda, Queue kullanmaı nominalm projelerinin verimliliğini pozitifrabilir.
Sum(IEnumerable, Func) Computes the sum of the sequence of nullable Double values that are obtained by invoking a transform function on each element of the input sequence.
Elements(IEnumerable, XName) Returns a filtered collection of the child elements of every element and document in the source collection. Only elements that have a matching XName are included in the collection.
Implementers are encouraged C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Nasıl Kullanılır to extend this base class instead of creating their own. Members of this base class are protected and are intended to be used through a derived class only.
Inheriting from a non-generic base class would be ineffecient. If the type was using a non-generic base, all it would be would be a thin layer above the base collection, where C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Temel Özellikleri the generic features would simply derive from casting from the underlying object instances of the base collection.
Important Some information relates to prerelease C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Nerelerde Kullanılıyor product that may be substantially modified before it’s released. Microsoft makes no warranties, express C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Nedir or implied, with respect to the information provided here.
I don't know if there is any way of protecting non-atomic elements without C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Kullanımı cloning them before placing them in the read only list. Share Improve this answer Follow